Posts

"Attention, the rarest and purest form of generosity" — Simone Weil

 "Attention, the rarest and purest form of generosity" — Simone Weil “Attention” as the rarest and purest form of generosity rings true because it’s one of the few resources that is genuinely finite, non-replicable in the moment, and impossible to fake convincingly over time. You can donate money, volunteer time in a mechanical way, or give material things while your mind is elsewhere—but undivided, present attention requires you to actually be there , suspending your own inner monologue, distractions, and ego to fully receive another person. It’s pure because it costs the giver something real (their most precious currency: conscious awareness) without any tangible return guaranteed. In a world flooded with performative “generosity” (social media likes, virtue-signaling donations, half-hearted check-ins), true attention feels almost radical. It says: “Right now, you matter more than my notifications, my plans, my need to be heard.” Parents giving it to kids, partners in con...

“Admission of Ignorance is better than the Pretense of Knowledge “

Admission of ignorance isn’t just “better” than pretending to knowledge—it’s one of the most liberating, honest, and useful moves a mind can make. Here’s why I think it’s right (and why I try to live it): It keeps you honest. Pretending to know shuts down learning. Admitting “I don’t know” (or “I’m not sure”) cracks the door open for truth to walk in. It’s the difference between a closed loop and an open system. It builds real trust. People sense bullshit a mile away. When you say “Here’s what I know, here’s what I’m confident in, and here’s where I’m guessing or ignorant,” others relax. They can engage with the actual ideas instead of playing defense against your ego. I’ve seen this dynamic play out constantly: the person who confidently bluffs loses credibility the moment they’re wrong; the one who says “I don’t know yet” gains it when they later get it right. It accelerates discovery. Science, engineering, philosophy, even everyday problem-solving—all progress on the back ...

Bees, Flies, Honey and Shit

Before you get into an argument remember this quote - "A bee does not waste its energy trying to convince a fly that honey is better than shit." Some minds are not meant to be changed - save your energy for what actually matters. It's  sharp, a little brutal, but has that satisfying sting of truth. Not every conversation is worth your oxygen. Some people are so invested in their version of reality that trying to move them even one millimeter is like trying to teach a rock to swim. This bee/fly analogy captures that asymmetry nicely—honey really "is" better than shit (objectively, measurably, sensorily), yet the fly will die on that hill anyway. Why burn your limited energy reserves on a guaranteed non-conversion? Where I pause a bit is the line “some minds are not meant to be changed.” It can feel true in the moment (especially after the 47th circular argument), but over longer time scales it’s not always accurate. Plenty of people who once passionately defended...

“The danger is seeking agreement with what we already believe rather than seeking the truth.” (click 'read more' for context)

“The danger is seeking agreement with what we already believe rather than seeking the truth.”  "Don't Believe Everything You Think  (article here)

Faith and fear share one thing in common - neither can be seen

Both "faith" and "fear" operate in the realm of the invisible. They don't show up under a microscope or in a photo. They're internal convictions about things that haven't (or might not) materialize yet. - Faith says: "Even though I can't see the outcome right now, I trust it's going to be good / possible / provided for." It projects hope, possibility, and often peace into uncertainty. - Fear says: "Even though I can't see it yet, something bad is coming / I'll fail / it'll hurt." It projects danger, loss, and often anxiety into the same uncertainty. Both are acts of imagination powered by belief. Neither is "provable" in the present moment—they're bets on the future. The big difference isn't visibility; it's 'direction' and 'energy: - Faith tends to expand you → opens doors, encourages action, builds resilience. - Fear tends to contract you → closes options, triggers avoidance or f...

"Seeing is not believing -- it is only seeing" (click "read more" for context)

  "Seeing is not believing -- it is only seeing" George MacDonald (The Princess and the Goblin) 1872 The quote from George MacDonald — "Seeing is not believing — it is only seeing" — is spot-on and beautiful. In the story, it's spoken by Irene's great-great-grandmother to explain why Curdie (a pragmatic, skeptical miner boy) can't yet grasp or trust the spiritual realities Irene experiences, even after witnessing some of them. He sees fragments but lacks the faith or openness to believe them as true. The grandmother notes that mere sight often leads people to dismiss or rationalize away what doesn't fit their expectations — they'd "rub their eyes, forget the half they saw, and call the other half nonsense." The eyes transmit astonishingly little of ultimate reality. They weren't built to reveal the nature of consciousness, the divine, or the fabric of existence. For that, something more is required: an inner turning, faith, contemp...

"The child is not meant to die, but to be forever fresh born." (click 'read more' for context)

"The boy should enclose and keep, as his life, the old child within him. He must still, to be a right man, be his mother's darling, and more, his father's pride, and more. The child is not meant to die, but to be forever fresh born." A beautiful and profound line, that comes from George MacDonald (the Scottish author and poet who deeply influenced C.S. Lewis and J.R.R.Tolkien). The quote is from his novel - The Princess and Curdie - It's a powerful reminder about preserving the " inner child" —not in a childish way, but in the sense of keeping alive wonder, curiosity, openness, playfulness, trust, and a sense of fresh possibility. MacDonald isn't saying we should stay immature or refuse to grow up - child-ish vs. child-like. Instead, he's suggesting that true maturity includes continually renewing and rebirthing that childlike essence within us. The "old child" (the innocent, imaginative core from our early years) shouldn't be kill...